RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9

From: Densteadt, James (james.densteadt@eds.com)
Date: Fri Jan 07 2000 - 16:58:59 EST

Next message: Scott Miller: "RE: 2000 Chrysler Nationals (formerly C@C)"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: Rustproofing...again!"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Johnson: "Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Next in thread: mrdancer: "Re: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

hehe

-----Original Message-----
From: SuperNagz@aol.com [mailto:SuperNagz@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 4:28 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9

Answer: The R/T 5.9 was parked with nobody behind the wheel.

Next message: Scott Miller: "RE: 2000 Chrysler Nationals (formerly C@C)"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: Rustproofing...again!"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Johnson: "Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Next in thread: mrdancer: "Re: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:29 EDT