RE: Re: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9

From: Scott Miller (kmiller@cvn.net)
Date: Tue Dec 07 1999 - 21:51:45 EST


Jon, you say about the 727 tranny, why not the 904, that's what I got built
for my truck and it's holdin' up excellent. I had good clutches and a Turbo
Action manual valve body put in. I got an awesome second gear, better than
any shift kit I felt, and I'm definetely in control as to when the truck
shifts. I've also seen guys with small blocks switch from 727 to a 904 and
pick up about .3 in the 1/4. I also think the 904 can be built to handle
what you throw at it. I've seen them make many 10 sec. passes.

Just a FYI

Scott Miller
Shelby Dakota #322 (14.89 @ 89mph)
94 V-6 Dakota Sport (16.01 @ 85mph)
http://racetruck.tripod.com
http://racetruck.tripod.com/new/94dak.html

> and I've got the bent valves to prove it... :-( This is why once
> I build up my engine and need a heavy duty tranny, a competition
> 727 (w/manual valve body) will be installed instead. Nothing against
> the 5-speeds; manuals are my favorite as well, but facts is facts,
> and for dragstrip duty, I don't think you can go wrong with an
> auto. (Unless of course you want to step it up a notch with a
> Jerico or Lenco...)
>
>
> -Jon-
>
> .--- jon@dakota-truck.net -- or -- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu
> ------------.
> | Jon Steiger * AOPA, DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA *
> RP-SEL |
> | '92 Ram 150 4x4 V8, '96 Dakota V8, '96 Intruder 1400, '96
> FireFly 447 |
> `---------------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:32 EDT