2000 Mustang produces 190HP. Expect it to climb to the 220HP in two years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
Office: (760) 725-2296
-----Original Message-----
From: Lynn Pedersen [mailto:davewaco@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 11:30 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
No offence to Dakota V6 owners. We are talking about a Mustang V6
here!!!
Dave Waco
Terri Pryer wrote:
>
> Oh really. That dosen't surprise me at all.
> Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lynn Pedersen <davewaco@sympatico.ca>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Monday, February 07, 2000 9:32 AM
> Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
>
> >Terry, Hi! The answer is no. He's off in Dreamland driving a V6!!!
> > Dave Waco
> >
> >
> >Terri Pryer wrote:
> >>
> >> Did they ever put 5.0s in the 98 body style? I have seen a guy with
that
> >> badge on the rear where the svt logo would normally be and was
wondering?
> >> Mark
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: NVMYDakota@aol.com <NVMYDakota@aol.com>
> >> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> >> Date: Sunday, February 06, 2000 8:54 PM
> >> Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
> >>
> >> >In a message dated 2/6/00 9:33:35 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> >> >mkeast@golden.net writes:
> >> >
> >> >> Sorry about that......it's acutally a 95' 5.0 Mustang. I had the
> year
> >> >> wrong....I couldn't remember
> >> >> if it was '95 or '96 that was the last year of the 5 litre.
Anyways,
> I
> >> >> pretty much figured that I would
> >> >> have trouble keeping up with a 5.0 Stang...atleast off the line.
> From
> >> what
> >> >> I've noticed it seems very fast early on but abit sluggish in
higher
> >> gears.
> >> >> It's fast but I'm not impressed with it otherwise.
> >> >> Lots of rattles coming from everywhere (very annoying) just doens't
> feel
> >> >> like it is well put together.
> >> >> I will probably give it a try anyway!....
> >> >
> >> >Wow I am very sorry to hear this, I found a Semi Modded Rustang
(Exhaust
> >> and
> >> >Intake) Just like me(well mine a Dakota...) Anyways, I showd this
idiot
> >> what
> >> >Magnum Power meant.... He had a Big Ol 5.0L sticker diagonally across
> on
> >> teh
> >> >rear quater panel! damn this was too much fun.... The only car I
won't
> >> mess
> >> >wiht are those 5.0 Cobras, there pretty damned fast,
> >> >
> >> >As for the Fit and Finish of mustangs, the feel like they were made in
> >> >Mexico(Mexican quality) and it seemed like somone dumped ina buncha
> >> Mexican
> >> >Jumpin Beans, ratlles and noises everywhere, I see why every mustang
has
> a
> >> >loud stereo!!!!!!!!!!
> >> >
> >> > Greg
> >> >
> >> >PS even my OLD 1993 Dakota was quiter than taht damned mustang!
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:56 EDT