Re: Re:Ted needs a M1

From: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com
Date: Fri Mar 10 2000 - 12:03:10 EST

Next message: Shane Moseley: "Re: Re:M1 intake"
Previous message: DICEMAN469@aol.com: "Re: Dak VS. Ram"
Maybe in reply to: Alan Short: "Re:Ted needs a M1"
Next in thread: Shane Moseley: "Re: Re:Ted needs a M1"
Reply: Shane Moseley: "Re: Re:Ted needs a M1"
Reply: Alan Short: "Re: Re:Ted needs a M1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

NO it is not (by a long shot) smog legal.

Latr,

Shane

Stupid question here. Why do you say that ? Its just an intake manifold right.

Next message: Shane Moseley: "Re: Re:M1 intake"
Previous message: DICEMAN469@aol.com: "Re: Dak VS. Ram"
Maybe in reply to: Alan Short: "Re:Ted needs a M1"
Next in thread: Shane Moseley: "Re: Re:Ted needs a M1"
Reply: Shane Moseley: "Re: Re:Ted needs a M1"
Reply: Alan Short: "Re: Re:Ted needs a M1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:36 EDT