"Barret, Matt" <MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com> wrote:
>Mods and their ET's. Terry's truck runs 14.7's, his truck is about 200
>pounds heavier than my Reg Cab. So that is about .20 sec. (about) so if ya
I believe the weight difference is more than 200 pounds.
>subtract that off of his ET, you get 14.5's, pretty interesting, but also,
>he dynoed at 213 hp and 302 TQ!
That was last year before some of the mods I had when I did my best
run at the track. Your whole argument here is bogus because you're
assuming things which are not true.
>Now I know people are going to read this and say, "well you're comparing CC
>to RC"
As well as a standard to an automatic.
>all I'm getting at is the little 287 will and does hold it's own against the
>big ole 360! Now, to Terry's defense cause he hasn't chimed in here, I was
Not when everything else is equal it doesn't, which is all I was
trying to say in the first place. The 4.7 is a great engine, don't
get me wrong, but the 5.9 is stronger. All of your arguments is not
going to change that fact.
>using numbers about his truck off of the DML profile, so he may have some
>more current numbers??
My current numbers and all of my mods, as well as an explanation of my
dyno run and what was installed at the time, are all on my web page,
had you bothered to look before posting.
>Not pick'n on ya Terry!! I know Terry has a since of humor, and as I have
>told him before a sweet truck!
I do have a sense of humor, but I don't understand why you took a
debate between the 4.7 and 5.9 and turned it into a debate between
your truck and my truck. The guy has made his decision and he bought
the 4.7. That's great, I know he'll enjoy the Durango. It would have
been faster with the 5.9, but like he said, the 4.7 has all the power
he needs.
Terry Herrin
99 FR CC R/T
14.769 @ 91.43
Wilmington, NC
http://users.isaac.net/therrin/dakota.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:16 EDT