I totally agree with Tom here, the sound is worth it!! :)
I'm supposed to dyno my truck again on June 30th, So I'll have a HP number
for you then.
I have to agree again with Tom, HP gain, if any, is all top end!
__________________________________
Matt --VA--Y2K-HEMI
`00 Sport Plus RC 4.7L 5spd.
9 1/4 3.92 LSD
Homemade air intake,T-Bars,
Spring clamps, Mobil 1,Hoosiers,
Flowmaster cat-back
BEST 1/4 14.48 @ 92.40 MPH
BEST 1/8 9.19 @ 72.58 MPH
BEST 60' 1.90 208 RWHP/285 RWTQ
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
-----Original Message-----
From: fawcett@uism.bu.edu [mailto:fawcett@uism.bu.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 7:25 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re[2]: DML: Installed Flowmaster Cat back
I don't have any dynamometer numbers to back this up but I didn't notice
much
change at all with my Flowmaster kit. On the top end it may pull just a tad
better with no change at all on the low end. It's tough to be objective
'cause
the nice sound sure makes it *seem* like your gaining some HP! ;-)
Tom
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: DML: Installed Flowmaster Cat back Re: Tom
Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net> at smtpout
Date: 6/19/00 12:47 AM
What kind of horse powr gane/ loss did you get from this? I need a new
exhaust
and have been thinking of putting a cat back on my 93 v6 .et me know if
its
worth it.......I'm sure it is I just want to know what I should be able to
expect with different cat backs like the flowmaster or any ohter
brand..thanks
guys
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:49 EDT