Re: Re: Shocks

From: mike d. (miggitymike@juno.com)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 16:35:18 EDT

Next message: Steven T. Ekstrand: "Re: Re: Almost fell victim to "the curse"! (long)"
Previous message: mike d.: "Re: Consumer Reports pissed off the wrong Dakota Owner!!"
Maybe in reply to: jdurling@mindspring.com: "Re: Shocks"
Reply: Ronald Wong: "RE: Re: Shocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>>All of the discussion on shocks caught my eye as I have a 00 QC, 2WD,
4.7
with the handling package. This is the worst riding truck I have ever
had. I
was
wondering if all were that way or if it is just mine ? Any feedback from
other QC owners would be appreciated.<<

just curious, what do you mean "rides bad"? Too firm? too squishy? too
bouncy?

-miggity

miggitymike@juno.com
PROJECT 13's ---> slammed 88 Dakota w/360 swap in progress!

http://surf.to/Project13s

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

Next message: Steven T. Ekstrand: "Re: Re: Almost fell victim to "the curse"! (long)"
Previous message: mike d.: "Re: Consumer Reports pissed off the wrong Dakota Owner!!"
Maybe in reply to: jdurling@mindspring.com: "Re: Shocks"
Reply: Ronald Wong: "RE: Re: Shocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:55:59 EDT