Augh! Maybe more power?
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Clark [mailto:bclark@vitts.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 5:35 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: 2000 dak 4.7-Mileage
I don't have the 4.7, but with 3.9. I get about 17 MPH but most of that is
highway driving at about 70 to 75 MPH. Compared to my previous 94 Dak 4X4
Sport I got almost 20 MPH, so I'm rather disappointed that 17 MPH is the
best I get considering my 00 Dak 4X4 is supposed to be more streamlined in
shape where as the 94 had more of a block shape.
Bret
00 4x4 Dak
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Clawson" <johnc@asltg.com>
To: "dmllist" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:27 AM
Subject: DML: 2000 dak 4.7-Mileage
> pcoyle,
>
> I have pretty much same truck as you(see sig) and got barely 11 mpg when
> new. Now a year later and 13000 miles I'm real close to 14 mpg and I do
> a)mostly city driving and b)lots of heavy right foot. Don't remember a
> single tank of gas that I used w/o my foot in it some of the time.
>
> Anyway, my observation is that this motor is REAL tight from the factory
> and takes a while to break in. Don't know what the mods have done to
> mileage(wasn't my purpose for them), but as long as its improving, so
> much the better.
>
> HTH
> jc
> 00,cc,4X4,4.7,auto,3.92sg,hd everything
> Flowmaster,quickd air,Jet II,180 stat
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:28 EDT