Re: Turbo or v6

From: greg conner (dodgeboy93@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 09:33:05 EDT


Now that I think about it...back when I had the 88 I had access to a 2.5
turbomotor. A 4cyl to 4cyl swap would be less difficult..but going from
carb to fuel injection is a pain. It would be fairly easy to do if you had
a complete donor car to swap parts from. Just go get one of those turbo 3
motors..that should make it fun to drive..;)

>From: "Tim Comstock" <skatenerd@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Turbo or v6
>Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:35:28 -0000
>
>88 Dakota, 2.2. Which is my best option weighing ease, gas mileage, and
>performance: A turbocharged 2.2, a v6, or a v8. I'd love to stick in a v8
>but what all would I have to change? Engine, transmission, driveshaft...?
>And what about the others? Any feedback would be nice.
>Tim
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:50 EDT