Re: Re: Re: Bolt in Dana 60 rear with Disk brakes for Daks

From: Mark Kuzia (flyboy01@mediaone.net)
Date: Sat Jul 28 2001 - 00:02:10 EDT


No, actually you don't PICK UP any pieces, they all stay nicely contained
inside the housing. ; )

Mark Kuzia
flyboy01@mediaone.net
http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph
~360ci, 5-spd, 8 3/4 rear / 3.90-SG <<<<<<<<<<<< LOOK, ITS FINALLY IN!
1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Miller" <fastdak@superpa.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Bolt in Dana 60 rear with Disk brakes for Daks

> It's only a matter of time until you are picking up pieces especially if
it
> is a factory unit and you drive a five speed
>
> 8 3/4 equipped....
>
> Scott Miller
> 89 Shelby Dakota #322 - 360 C.I. V8 (12.25 @ 112.41 mph) "FASTDAK"
> 95 SLT CC V8 5.2 auto
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TonyC <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:30 PM
> Subject: DML: Re: Bolt in Dana 60 rear with Disk brakes for Daks
>
>
> > The 9.25 in my 98 5.2 has. I've also seen rather consistant 1.89-1.91
60
> > footers with a best of 1.87.
> > TonyC
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: WMBARRET@aol.com <WMBARRET@aol.com>
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Date: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:50 PM
> > Subject: DML: Bolt in Dana 60 rear with Disk brakes for Daks
> >
> >
> > >Anybody else seen the Dana 60 bolt in rears for Dakotas and Durangos
that
> > DTS (Drive train Specialist) are now offering??? I've got a request in
> for
> > pricing.
> > >I'm wondering if you can get it with drum brakes, to cut down on the
> cost.
> > Check it out http://www.drivetrainspecialists.com/index2.htm
> > >the rear end pictured on there Home page is the Dakota rear, LOOKS
SWEET
> > with disks and an Aluminum cover!!
> > >
> > >Maybe the Dana will hold a 3500 rpm clutch dump, with a 1.88 60'
time???
> :)
> > Grin <<< cause the 9 1/4 sure won't!!
> > >
> > >I guess the trans will be next??
> > >
> > >Matt Y2K-HEMI
> > >'00 RC 4.7L 5spd
> > >14.23 @94.49
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:14 EDT