RE: gen II body style

From: Neil W. Bellenger (neil624b@rochester.rr.com)
Date: Mon Dec 24 2001 - 10:53:10 EST

Next message: Tom Slick North: "Re: gen II body style"
Previous message: Neil W. Bellenger: "RE: Gas Prices"
In reply to: Walter Felix: "Re: gen II body style"
Next in thread: Ed Halterman: "Re: gen II body style"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Subject: Re: DML: gen II body style

{1987-1996 Gen I
{1997+ Gen II

{My argument to support this belief:

{(1) First and foremost, the official Chrysler body designation for
1987-1996
{Dakotas is "N" Body and for 1997+ Dakotas is "AN" Body.

Ever willing to toss a few ounces of holiday rum onto a potential flambé,
I'll add this:
How about calling the 1991-1996 a Gen IA?

Neil

Next message: Tom Slick North: "Re: gen II body style"
Previous message: Neil W. Bellenger: "RE: Gas Prices"
In reply to: Walter Felix: "Re: gen II body style"
Next in thread: Ed Halterman: "Re: gen II body style"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:43 EDT