Re: Okay, magnum question

From: Jim Miller (jim76712@swbell.net)
Date: Sun Jan 13 2002 - 23:54:13 EST


You would have to change the computer nd wire harness to the engine. Pretty
good job but doable.

Gus wrote:

> So basically the difference is that the magnum engine has a roller cam,
> different heads and intake manifold. How hard would it be to put a magnum
> engine in place of a standard engine?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin" <ksmith10@kornet.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:44 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Okay, magnum question
>
> > Yes
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gus" <crtech@hot.rr.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: DML: Okay, magnum question
> >
> >
> > > So only the magnum engines had the hydraulic roller camshaft?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hydraulic Roller camshaft as well.
> > >
> > > > Different head and intake mostly. Supposed to deliver a better, more
> > > > usable power band for a truck. The trade mark was coined by Chrysler
> > > > back in the late 60s but referred to car engines back then. I believe
> > > > the term was only used on 440, 383 and maybe 340 cid models.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:48 EDT