Re: Okay, magnum question

From: Gus (crtech@hot.rr.com)
Date: Sun Jan 13 2002 - 23:29:07 EST


Thank You.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Miller" <jim76712@swbell.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Okay, magnum question

> You would have to change the computer nd wire harness to the engine.
Pretty
> good job but doable.
>
> Gus wrote:
>
> > So basically the difference is that the magnum engine has a roller cam,
> > different heads and intake manifold. How hard would it be to put a
magnum
> > engine in place of a standard engine?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kevin" <ksmith10@kornet.net>
> > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: DML: Okay, magnum question
> >
> > > Yes
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Gus" <crtech@hot.rr.com>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:25 AM
> > > Subject: Re: DML: Okay, magnum question
> > >
> > >
> > > > So only the magnum engines had the hydraulic roller camshaft?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hydraulic Roller camshaft as well.
> > > >
> > > > > Different head and intake mostly. Supposed to deliver a better,
more
> > > > > usable power band for a truck. The trade mark was coined by
Chrysler
> > > > > back in the late 60s but referred to car engines back then. I
believe
> > > > > the term was only used on 440, 383 and maybe 340 cid models.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:48 EDT