Re: Goodbye 1999 and hello something else

From: Gary Bower (gwbower@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 17:58:25 EST


I just sold a 99 SLT 318 CC 4X4. with 122,000 miles I figured I better sell
it while it is still worth something on the used car market.(In another
year it would have had 180,000 miles. I replaced it with a 2002. the rebates
and incentivees were pletifull, so I wound up with a good deal.All else the
same(except the 2002 has a power seat-nice on long drives). I only got the
2002 today(67 miles ), but an fairly impressed with it so far.
Hope this helps you decide.

""Jason Banta"" <jason.banta@louisville.edu> wrote in message
news:sc42d038.023@gwise.louisville.edu...
> I have a 2001 QC SLT 4.7 Automatic. I bought it with 13 miles on it
> June 2nd, I now have almost 14000 miles on it and have had no problems
> at all. It runs very strong and has plenty of power to do what ever I
> ask of it. All electronics work great on the interior of the truck.
>
> Hope this helps, If I had to buy a new vehicle, I would suggest getting
> the 4.7l.
>
> >>> RSuter@bizfon.com 01/14/02 11:11AM >>>
>
> The time has come to get rid of my '99 SLT. And the question is, what
> do I
> replace it with? A full size? A Tundra? Another Dakota? I'd really like
> to
> have enough faith in Mopar to buy another Dakota, but my '99 has been
> very
> strong evidence against that possible faith. Help me out here guys....
> Fess
> up and let me know how "faithful" your later model 4.7 auto 4x4s have
> been.
> Pinging? Leaking? Running crappy? Ball joints? Cab mounts? Headlight
> switches? How many of these maladies have carried thru to current
> models?
>
> thanks,
>
> Rick
>
> ps. Anyone want an Mopar Performance computer for a '99 5.2l, 4x4, non
> California? (It will only fit a truck spec'd like this)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:49 EDT