Re: Re: magnum motors

From: Chad Evans (hemidak@msn.com)
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 08:51:25 EST


what year had the best cam as far as stock goes?
is the 95 5.2L cam "lumpier" than say a 99 5.2L cam.

hemidak@msn.com

>From: Shane Moseley <smoseley@ix.netcom.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Re: magnum motors
>Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 06:16:54 -0600
>
>And roller lifters w/attaching spider bolted down to the intake valley.
>New
>front cover, new water pump, and serpentine belt drive system. Around 95
>came
>new (and more powerful) fuel and ignition controllers as well. Cam
>profiles
>changed almost every year and at least every 2 years.
>
>Latr,
>
>Shane
>
>Jon Smith wrote:
>
> > Don't forget a slightly lumpier cam also ;-) '95s are still the best
>Dak
> > to date =)
> >
> > Jon Smit
> >
> > Remember in 92 the exhaust manifolds were bigger too, it was rated a
>235hp.
> > And Pat's 92 was friggin fast. I drove it once, and watched it run away
>from
> > me on I95.
> >
> > Boog
>

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:49 EDT