The exact same thing happened to me.
Shane Moseley wrote:
> This is weird. My post was addressed to the list (only) and made it to
> the list. This showed up last night in my inbox. (I went to sleep
> early). I don't have time to dig into it but someone on list might want
>
> a stab at it...
>
> -Shane
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Permanent Delivery Failure
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:44:23 -0500
> From: MDaemon@damar.net
> Reply-To: BadMsgQ@damar.net
> To: smoseley@ix.netcom.com
>
> The attached message had permanent fatal delivery errors!
>
> After several unsuccessful delivery attempts the attached message has
> been removed from the mail queues on this server. The number and
> frequency of delivery attempts are determined by local configuration
> parameters.
>
> YOUR MESSAGE WAS NOT DELIVERED!
>
> Failed address: ccurrie_mobile@hotmail.com
>
> --- Session Transcript ---
> Waiting for socket connection...
> Socket connection established
> Waiting for protocol initiation...
> 220-HotMail (NO UCE) ESMTP server ready at Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:45:02
> -0800
> 220 ESMTP spoken here
> EHLO damar.net
> 250-hotmail.com Hello
> 250-8bitmime
> 250 SIZE 1572864
> MAIL From:<smoseley@ix.netcom.com> SIZE=3860
> 250 Requested mail action okay, completed
> RCPT To:<ccurrie_mobile@hotmail.com>
> 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation
> QUIT
> --- End Transcript ---
>
> : Message contains [1] file attachments
> --------------80955FB9D64A052D5DD7CE99
> Content-Type: message/rfc822;
> name="md50000299673.md"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename="md50000299673.md"
>
> Received: from mail.ebtech.net [142.250.0.25] by damar.net
> [142.250.2.88]
> with DomainPOP (MDaemon.Standard.v5.0.4.R)
> for <ccurrie@damar.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:37:38 -0500
> Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [205.246.19.13])
> by sun.ebtech.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0U3d6413108
> for <ccurrie@src.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:39:06 -0500
> Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA70344
> for dakota-truck-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:53:19 -0500 (EST)
>
> (envelope-from owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net)
> Received: from mail1.buffnet.net (mail1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.62])
> by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA70334
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002
> 22:53:17 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from smoseley@ix.netcom.com)
> Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net (johnson.mail.mindspring.net
> [207.69.200.177])
> by mail1.buffnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA60374
> for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:28:11 -0500
> (EST)
> (envelope-from smoseley@ix.netcom.com)
> Received: from sdn-ar-002tnmempp169.dialsprint.net ([168.191.72.209]
> helo=ix.netcom.com)
> by johnson.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
> id 16VlQ2-0003DL-00
> for dakota-truck@buffnet.net; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:28:18 -0500
> Message-ID: <3C57683D.B1A3BAEB@ix.netcom.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:27:57 -0600
> From: Shane Moseley <smoseley@ix.netcom.com>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: Hyper Speed Controller
> References: <001a01c1a925$3303dda0$090aa8c0@homenet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
> X-Mailing-List-Owner: jon@dakota-truck.net
> X-URL: http://www.dakota-truck.net
> X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to
> majordomo@buffnet.net
> X-Unsubscribe-URL: http://www.dakota-truck.net/CGI-BIN/dml.html
> X-MDRemoteIP: 142.250.0.25
> X-MDRcpt-To: ccurrie@damar.net
> X-MDRedirect: 1
> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ccurrie_mobile@hotmail.com
>
> >>All closed-loop situtations (if functioning properly) will AVERAGE in
> the long
> >>run to be almost exactly what they are trying to achieve. It's only
> been that
> >>way for over 50 years. Do some reading on control circuits. I have a
>
> degree
> >>from an accredited Engineering school in just that - do you?
>
> >you say average.. we are looking at actuall readings, not averages...
> And
> >yes, I do have a degree form an accredited engineering school.... :-)
>
> >over 50 years? I didn't know that electronic (not mechanical) fuel
> >injection has been around that long....
>
> "Bernd D. Ratsch" wrote:
>
> > We were talking about ELECTRONIC controllers.
>
> No, I was not talking about electronic anything. Tom (Mr. Slick) was
> talking about electronic fuel injection or something like that. I was
> talking about "All closed-loop situations" or systems averaging out to
> be
> the desired control variable. Get your facts straight. This is mostly
> directed at Mr. Slick. Now he's putting words in my mouth. I've quoted
>
> the exact post above w/my statements preceded by >> and Tom's with >.
> Go
> back and read....oh wait...thats futile.
>
> How 'bout we talk some about the HyperSpeed controller and its ability
> (or
> inability) to control A/F ratio? Especially since that was my initial
> goal. You guys degraded the conversation into what we have now. Mr.
> Slick jerked my chain and now he's feeling the wrath. I meant no harm
> to
> you - just kinda ticked that a previous situation is starting up all
> over
> again. Personal attacks and dodging the real issue.
>
> Latr,
>
> Shane
-- -andy andylevy@yahoo.com Maintainer, DML FAQ - http://www.dakota-truck.net/faq/ http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/ '99 CC 4x4 318 auto
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:53 EDT