This is weird

From: Shane Moseley (smoseley@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2002 - 06:34:48 EST


This is weird. My post was addressed to the list (only) and made it to
the list. This showed up last night in my inbox. (I went to sleep
early). I don't have time to dig into it but someone on list might want

a stab at it...

-Shane

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Permanent Delivery Failure
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:44:23 -0500
From: MDaemon@damar.net
Reply-To: BadMsgQ@damar.net
To: smoseley@ix.netcom.com

The attached message had permanent fatal delivery errors!

After several unsuccessful delivery attempts the attached message has
been removed from the mail queues on this server. The number and
frequency of delivery attempts are determined by local configuration
parameters.

YOUR MESSAGE WAS NOT DELIVERED!

Failed address: ccurrie_mobile@hotmail.com

--- Session Transcript ---
 Waiting for socket connection...
 Socket connection established
 Waiting for protocol initiation...
 220-HotMail (NO UCE) ESMTP server ready at Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:45:02
-0800
 220 ESMTP spoken here
 EHLO damar.net
 250-hotmail.com Hello
 250-8bitmime
 250 SIZE 1572864
 MAIL From:<smoseley@ix.netcom.com> SIZE=3860
 250 Requested mail action okay, completed
 RCPT To:<ccurrie_mobile@hotmail.com>
 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation
 QUIT
--- End Transcript ---

: Message contains [1] file attachments
--------------80955FB9D64A052D5DD7CE99
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
 name="md50000299673.md"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="md50000299673.md"

Received: from mail.ebtech.net [142.250.0.25] by damar.net
[142.250.2.88]
        with DomainPOP (MDaemon.Standard.v5.0.4.R)
        for <ccurrie@damar.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:37:38 -0500
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net
[205.246.19.13])
        by sun.ebtech.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0U3d6413108
        for <ccurrie@src.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:39:06 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
        by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA70344
        for dakota-truck-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:53:19 -0500 (EST)

        (envelope-from owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net)
Received: from mail1.buffnet.net (mail1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.62])
        by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA70334
        for <dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002
22:53:17 -0500 (EST)
        (envelope-from smoseley@ix.netcom.com)
Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net (johnson.mail.mindspring.net
[207.69.200.177])
        by mail1.buffnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA60374
        for <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:28:11 -0500
(EST)
        (envelope-from smoseley@ix.netcom.com)
Received: from sdn-ar-002tnmempp169.dialsprint.net ([168.191.72.209]
helo=ix.netcom.com)
        by johnson.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
        id 16VlQ2-0003DL-00
        for dakota-truck@buffnet.net; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:28:18 -0500
Message-ID: <3C57683D.B1A3BAEB@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:27:57 -0600
From: Shane Moseley <smoseley@ix.netcom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: Hyper Speed Controller
References: <001a01c1a925$3303dda0$090aa8c0@homenet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
X-Mailing-List: The Dakota Mailing List
X-Mailing-List-Owner: jon@dakota-truck.net
X-URL: http://www.dakota-truck.net
X-Unsubscribe-Info: Send "unsubscribe dakota-truck" to
majordomo@buffnet.net
X-Unsubscribe-URL: http://www.dakota-truck.net/CGI-BIN/dml.html
X-MDRemoteIP: 142.250.0.25
X-MDRcpt-To: ccurrie@damar.net
X-MDRedirect: 1
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ccurrie_mobile@hotmail.com

>>All closed-loop situtations (if functioning properly) will AVERAGE in
the long
>>run to be almost exactly what they are trying to achieve. It's only
been that
>>way for over 50 years. Do some reading on control circuits. I have a

degree
>>from an accredited Engineering school in just that - do you?

>you say average.. we are looking at actuall readings, not averages...
And
>yes, I do have a degree form an accredited engineering school.... :-)

>over 50 years? I didn't know that electronic (not mechanical) fuel
>injection has been around that long....

"Bernd D. Ratsch" wrote:

> We were talking about ELECTRONIC controllers.

No, I was not talking about electronic anything. Tom (Mr. Slick) was
talking about electronic fuel injection or something like that. I was
talking about "All closed-loop situations" or systems averaging out to
be
the desired control variable. Get your facts straight. This is mostly
directed at Mr. Slick. Now he's putting words in my mouth. I've quoted

the exact post above w/my statements preceded by >> and Tom's with >.
Go
back and read....oh wait...thats futile.

How 'bout we talk some about the HyperSpeed controller and its ability
(or
inability) to control A/F ratio? Especially since that was my initial
goal. You guys degraded the conversation into what we have now. Mr.
Slick jerked my chain and now he's feeling the wrath. I meant no harm
to
you - just kinda ticked that a previous situation is starting up all
over
again. Personal attacks and dodging the real issue.

Latr,

Shane



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:53 EDT