Re: defense for "defective exhaust" citation

From: mgrose@ameritech.net
Date: Wed Jan 30 2002 - 12:34:49 EST

Next message: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: This is weird"
Previous message: mgrose@ameritech.net: "Re: defense for "defective exhaust" citation"
In reply to: Pukeloser@aol.com: "defense for "defective exhaust" citation"
Next in thread: mark janke: "RE: defense for "defective exhaust" citation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Also forgot to add 4513.22 which is probably what they cited you on. That
is the law about mufflers.

-Matt Grose
South Euclid, OH
97 RC 4x4 Sport 3.9L V6
DML Profile: http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Gv2394THi1OPQ/

Next message: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: This is weird"
Previous message: mgrose@ameritech.net: "Re: defense for "defective exhaust" citation"
In reply to: Pukeloser@aol.com: "defense for "defective exhaust" citation"
Next in thread: mark janke: "RE: defense for "defective exhaust" citation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:53 EDT