I noticed the Ram guys love the unit.
---------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
2003 Dodge Hemi 5.7 Ram 2500 Quad
2000 Dodge Dakota Hemi (Some idot hit the vehicle)
2000 Roush Ford TT-Mustang (1 of 2 beta vehicles)
1999 Chevy Astro (A.K.A. GM Junk)
1993 Geo Tracker (Amazing vehicle that keeps running)
PROJECT CAR:
1992 Suzuki Swift GT (fastest stock sub-compact at 160HP/1775lb vehicle)
Intercooled Turbo - 350HP FY-03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Future Purchases:
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10 with a V-10 (replace the Suzuki)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of RayB
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:29 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: RE: RE: Hypertech address
I noticed that as well. Not trying to bash a product I haven't tried but
it's also curious that some of their peak HP and torque improvements are
achieved as low as 1000 rpm??
Guess we need to see some member's actual dyno or track numbers to really
know. Too bad they don't make the programmer for the Gen II daks or I'd try
one out (if they have a full refund return policy). With the extensive
records I keep of every run I've ever made, I'd know with one visit to the
track if it was worth the money. (course I'd have to wait till spring cause
the local tracks are all closed. something about snow and ice??):-)
RayB
http://www.dragtruk.com/ENTRIES/20KM1FD2KWBP.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Saint
> OK....I am laughing my rear off. If you look at some of the dyno
> charts the
> lower right bottom numbers just don't jive with the chart.
>
> What gives, Greg?
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:48:14 EST