Re: RE: Porting stock heads (Ray Block)

From: Gary Hedlin (ghedlin@theramp.net)
Date: Sat Mar 22 2003 - 02:43:19 EST


Yes and no... if he changed the cam, he'ld be fine, but if he doesnt he
wouldnt be able to take advantage of the larger valves. He would just be
throwing money away.

Gary Hedlin

""RayB"" <bpracing@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:DHELJEKAGJCDGEGBEHHJEEJACNAA.bpracing@worldnet.att.net...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Hey Ray (and others that are interested),
> > I came across this article and thought it kind of related to a
> > few questions
> > asked here on the DML recently. I know it's a Ford article (hey,
> > I'm gonna
> > fix up my 5.0 LX SOMEDAY), but the topic relates to what ya'll were
> > discussing.
> >
> > Here's a quote: "With gains of 38HP and 39 ft lbs at the rear wheels,
> > PowerHeads were an impressive bolt on, to say the least. The
> > combination of
> > small ports to maintain maximum velocity, excellent flow numbers (for
the
> > runner size) and an affordable price, make the PowerHeads hard to
> > beat." --
> > Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords. July 1999 issue.> Brett Forehand
>
> Thanks Brett. I'm definitely a proponent of small port heads with high
> velocity for a street driven vehicle. I've been trying to talk a guy out
of
> buying heavily ported, big valve, R/T heads for a stock cammed 318. He's
> not listening though because the people selling them told him they'd be
> perfect for him. Guess he'll have to learn the hard way. :-)
>
> RayB
> http://www.dragtruk.com/ENTRIES/20KM1FD2KWBP.html
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:01 EST