RE: Re: Re: roller rockers

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Sat Mar 29 2003 - 16:17:52 EST


TB's normally will show about 8-10RWHP more. However, both will
compliment each other.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Eric Luce
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 3:06 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Re: Re: roller rockers

Okay John.
  Now you have me intrigued. Changing out the throttle body would be
substantially easier. What are we looking at cost-wise as compared to
the $400 rocker upgrade kit? I'm just looking at a single upgrade.
Computer upgrade is out. I don't want to be strapped to premium fuel,
and I do sometimes pull a trailer. That would not be a good choice.
Bernd stated that I could see 15-18 RWHP with the rocker upgrade. Do you
think that a throttle body upgrade could equal or better that number?
If that's truly the case, maybe I SHOULD be considering other options.
That's where this list sure comes in handy !!!! I'm open to other DML
comments from owners of GenIII Daks with a 5.2L/auto package. Okay
guys. John seems to be MORE than impressed with this approach. I'm open
for suggestions of what to look for/what to avoid. Would this require me
to have to change out or modfy
brackets, linkages, or anything else? Thanks all.

Eric Luce
'99 Dak, CC, SLT
5.2L, auto, 4X2
K&N FIPK, Catback, 180* thermostat

----- Original Message -----
From: <Pukeloser@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: DML: Re: roller rockers

>
> Just my 2 cents worth. If you havent already gotten a Throttle Body
> then you'd get more bang for the buck by purchasing a billet TB, not
> to mention it'd improve your fuel economy and actually pay for itself
> over the long haul. another option would be the computer but that
> would require premium
gas.
>
> John S



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:05 EST