ERRR should say Would M1 2bbl help me?
Proof-reading sometimes would help
Ken Allgood
97 CC SLT 5.2L
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Allgood" <kenallgood@cox.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 11:19 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: roller rockers
>
> All the air I need up to what point? What M1 2bbl intake help me
there..??
> Should compliment the TB and intake, correct? maybe?? :-)
>
> Oh yeah, if I stuff a banana up my tail-pipe, maybe I'll get enough
> backpressure for the exhaust then?? hehe
>
> Ken Allgood
> 97 CC SLT 5.2L
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Cellana" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:43 PM
> Subject: DML: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: roller rockers
>
>
> >
> > If the larger TB didn't give you any gains, then you already have ALL
the
> > air you need.
> >
> > Here is some info from my dyno sessions:
> >
> > Constants thru all runs: stock heads, stock cam and valve springs, MP
> > Headers, K&N FIPK, MP PCM, Jet Chip, no belt (max power runs), Accel
coil,
> > open exhaust, 3923s @ .35, Mobil 1 oil
> >
> > BB, 52 Fastman, stock injectors (black 19pph)
> > 256 @ 4100
> >
> > BB, F&B 52mm, 1.7 MP RRs, stock injectors
> > 267 @ 4400, 395 ft/lb @ 2600
> >
> > M1 2bbl with large turtle, F&B 52mm, 19 pph Design III injectors
> > 293 @ 5000, graph started too late to get true peak ft/lbs, but showed
365
> @
> > 3100
> >
> > In process: better valve springs to prevent valve float above 5500, and
> > some laughing gas. I'm shooting for 11s.
> >
> > TonyC
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ken Allgood <kenallgood@cox.net>
> > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > Date: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:01 PM
> > Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: roller rockers
> >
> >
> > >
> > >As much as I trust Bernds opinion and all, I have to say, I haven't
> really
> > >seen the performance gain on my Dakota after adding the F&B TB. I
think
> > >with both the TB and Rockers, I got higher HP on the top, but lost low
> end
> > >torque, so ET/speed didn't change much, but my HP numbers did increase
> (So
> > >I'm slower off the line, but I accelerate faster after getting off the
> > >line). That's what it seems like to me anyway :-)
> > >
> > >Maybe the headers will help some, think I'm going to have them
installed
> on
> > >Monday. Time to kill some more low-end (*duh*).
> > >
> > >Ken Allgood
> > >97 CC SLT 5.2L
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "RayB" <bpracing@worldnet.att.net>
> > >To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > >Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 9:42 PM
> > >Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: roller rockers
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> > >> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Bernd
D.
> > >> > Ratsch
> > >> >
> > >> > They make more than 1/10th of a difference...we've gone through a
lot
> > of
> > >> > testing on those already.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Bernd
> > >>
> > >> Not going to argue with you Bernd. You've got parts to sell. ;-)
> > >>
> > >> RayB
> > >> http://www.dragtruk.com/ENTRIES/20KM1FD2KWBP.html
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:05 EST