On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:44:36 -0400, ghedlin@theramp.net ("Gary
Hedlin") wrote:
>
>Ok... first off, I would LOVE to know how in the hell this got tuned from a
>mustang thing to a disability thing. Is there something I'm missing, or am
>I now MENTALLY handicapped?
>
>So what difference does it make that its a stick. Last time I checked my
>drivers license didn't have an "automatic vehicle only" restriction. If it
>was an automatic, would we even be having this debate? Or is the general
>consensus that this is too much car for disabled people in general?? As far
>as the State of Illinois is concerned, I'm qualified to drive ANY non
>commercial vehicle. When did a mustang SVT not qualify?
>
>I'm sorry to be rude, but I do not give a flying f**k. There's some people
>who think a mustang is too much for me, some think my V6 Dakota is too much
>for me, and some think that ANY vehicle is to much for me. They can all go
>to hell. I've worked too damn hard to be able to drive, and I've put even
>more effort into the vehicles I drive. I worked my ass of to get the money
>to pay for this car, and will continue to work to pay the operating
>expenses. I'll be damned if I cant reap the rewards of my hard work. I
>don't care if I have to spend the next 6 months in an abandoned parking lot
>getting to the point where I can operate the vehicle safely on the open
>road, I will drive this car!
>
>Anyone have a problem with this???
Hey Gary,
Just to let you know, I don't care what you drive. Sounds like a nice
set of wheels to me...
-Bill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:12 EST