I was just giving you some congratulations on the new ride...and being a
little jealous at the same time.........
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""Gary Hedlin"" <ghedlin@theramp.net> wrote in message news:b8aasm$svb$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > Ok... first off, I would LOVE to know how in the hell this got tuned from a > mustang thing to a disability thing. Is there something I'm missing, or am > I now MENTALLY handicapped? > > So what difference does it make that its a stick. Last time I checked my > drivers license didn't have an "automatic vehicle only" restriction. If it > was an automatic, would we even be having this debate? Or is the general > consensus that this is too much car for disabled people in general?? As far > as the State of Illinois is concerned, I'm qualified to drive ANY non > commercial vehicle. When did a mustang SVT not qualify? > > I'm sorry to be rude, but I do not give a flying f**k. There's some people > who think a mustang is too much for me, some think my V6 Dakota is too much > for me, and some think that ANY vehicle is to much for me. They can all go > to hell. I've worked too damn hard to be able to drive, and I've put even > more effort into the vehicles I drive. I worked my ass of to get the money > to pay for this car, and will continue to work to pay the operating > expenses. I'll be damned if I cant reap the rewards of my hard work. I > don't care if I have to spend the next 6 months in an abandoned parking lot > getting to the point where I can operate the vehicle safely on the open > road, I will drive this car! > > Anyone have a problem with this??? > > > Gary Hedlin > President > Hedlin Web Designs > http://www.hedlin.net > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:13 EST