Re: Re: Re: insurance?

From: Chad Evans (hemidak@msn.com)
Date: Wed May 28 2003 - 10:27:31 EDT


bad luck!
cost of the accidents that I have had!

they don't care that you have been a good paying customer for years before
that!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:07 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Re: insurance?

>
> That's a good point, however I don't want them to know that it's
lowered...
> they might just jack my rates even more b/c of the amount of work that's
> involved and b/c i'm more likely to race it then... insurance companies
are
> the devil!
>
> why did they drop you Chad??? that's not cool.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
>
>
> ""Kyle Vanditmars"" <kylevan@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:bb064h$pod$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> >
> > ""Josh Battles"" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote in message
> > news:bb048j$suf$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> > >
> > > Hey, I got my renewal for insurance on my Dak last week and noticed
that
> > my
> > > premium went up by like $50/year due to some bogus "truck rate
increase"
> > > because "trucks do more damage in accidents than cars" according to my
> > > agent. Did anyone else experience anything like this??? I just want
to
> > > make sure they're not jackin' my rates unjustly.
> >
> > Argue that because your truck is lowered, you're in more danger than a
> stock
> > height or raised vehicle... Hey, it's worth a shot... :-)
> >
> >
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:21 EST