Re: BFG A/T's Stink WAS Re: Tire Size

From: BARRY OLIVER (DHSPA58@dhs.state.il.us)
Date: Mon Jun 23 2003 - 12:37:35 EDT


Gary, don't you have a 2wd? What kind of BFG's were you running? What size? I would have to agree that 31x10.50 is about the minimum useful size in these tires, but that is the same for most all terrain tires. I saw a samauri with itty bitty (stock size looking) super swampers on it the other day. It was cool.

>>> ghedlin@theramp.net 06/22/03 10:03PM >>>

Yeah, my BFG's totally sucked. I replaced them with some Good Year
Wranglers about 8 months after I got the BFG's.

-- 
Gary Hedlin
President
Hedlin Web Designs
http://www.hedlin.net 
<B1LLYW@aol.com> wrote in message news:103.30fb465a.2c27badc@aol.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> BFG All-Terrains suck.   They are extremely overrated especially when you
> consider how much they sell for. They are lousy in the snow - the lugs
fill up so
> fast you might as well be running slicks.  They're loud, even for an
> all-terrain.  I bought them for my '02 and I've had them on for 18,000
miles.  I'll
> never buy another set.
>
> The only thing I can figure is that people spend so much for them, they
don't
> want to admit in public that they suck.  I'm usually not this one-sided on
> something but these tires have been a real disappointment.  I'm going back
to
> Yokohama's or Bridgestone's next time for all terrain tires.
>
> Bill White - http://www.bionicdodge.com 
>
> '02 Dakota QC 4x4, SLT +, 4.7, 5 spd, 3.92 LSD
> '95 Dakota CC 4x2, SLT, 318, 5 spd, 3.55 LSD
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:29 EST