Hes talking about changes needed to the rt heads to accomidate the rockers,
not to stock valve covers. REmoving the baffels all together is not a great
idea on the valve covers. A properly functioning pcv system will suck too
much oil into the intake manifold.
Greg Conner
1996 RC
3.9 hybrid
>From: "Gary Hedlin" <ghedlin@theramp.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: Re: DML: on the topic of rocker arms...
>Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:44:25 -0500
>
><srp@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:20030714230017.YKPT20948.lakemtao05.cox.net@smtp.central.cox.net...
> >
> > The 1.7s are fine on that lift-- puts you in the .512 range, maybe a
>little higher. I run the same setup, but with 1.92 RT heads.
> >
> > With Mopar rockers on RT heads, you'll need to cut the area around the
>pushrod holes-- as the casting/geometry is a little too tight.
> >
> > Crower bolt on without any changes.
> >
> > Sam
> >
> > www.socaldakota.com
> >
>
>
>So those of us removing the oil baffles to get the crower arms to fit have
>been doing it out of boredom??
>
>Gary Hedlin
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:37 EST