Re: The WRONG way to test for transmission troubles

From: Michael Maskalans (mike-lists@tepidcola.com)
Date: Tue Oct 14 2003 - 14:58:43 EDT

Next message: Michael Maskalans: "Re: KRC 408 Installed, and started tonight..."
Previous message: Michael Maskalans: "Re: RE: The WRONG way to test for transmission troubles"
In reply to: Gary Hedlin: "The WRONG way to test for transmission troubles"
Next in thread: John: "RE: The WRONG way to test for transmission troubles"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 01:41 AM, Gary Hedlin wrote:

> Instead of
> taking it somewhere to get checked out, I decided to find out for sure
> by
> taking it on a 300 mile trip down to my relatives in St. Louis MO!

you say that like there's something wrong with it. I agree completely:
>
> I think theres no better way to test a theory
> than to test it in a real life situation.
hasn't cost me too much yet (only an alternator <g>)

--
Michael Maskalans                '98 Dakota SLT CC 4x4 318
details here:             <http://mike.tepidcola.com/dak/>
mobile.612.618.4652  campus.585.274.2246  fax.954.697.0487

Next message: Michael Maskalans: "Re: KRC 408 Installed, and started tonight..."
Previous message: Michael Maskalans: "Re: RE: The WRONG way to test for transmission troubles"
In reply to: Gary Hedlin: "The WRONG way to test for transmission troubles"
Next in thread: John: "RE: The WRONG way to test for transmission troubles"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:03 EST