-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 7/8/2004 9:59 PM, Eric Huff wrote:
|>Ken, to add to your good notes, an electric fan gained 2 mpg for
|>my 5.2
|>
|>Rascal
|
|
|
| That's just amazing! Why would mopar put in electrics if it would
| allow them post 2 mpg better? (i'm not being sarcastic, i'm
| actually interested.)
Noise? Electrics are, believe it or not, generally louder than
engine-driven fans. My BM150 was quite scary, in fact. Plus the
heavier load on the electrical system. And a lot higher chance of
problems if the driver encounters deep water (not that *I* would know
anything about that :P)
You also need a *lot* of fan to keep these trucks cool in "any"
conditions. I had a BM150 on my '99 318 and it was close enough to
borderline that when I destroyed it, I went back to the mechanical fan.
~ In the deep south, in summer, in a traffic jam, forget it.
I did not notice a significant increase in mileage when I put the
electric on my 318.
- --
- -andy
http://home.rochester.rr.com/alevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us
- --------------------------------------------
"Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine"
-Bob Tom
- --------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFA7f+2xPJNBidNgHkRAoxJAJ45q6SDV8QtThbUi+m4bKBEGIeWPQCfWp7t
ckLtd/sLoPmwrJ/XakTrPYI=
=AMS2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 00:46:14 EDT