Re: Re: Difference between 91 and 92-up

From: TJ Goettner (dakota52318@toad.net)
Date: Mon Aug 30 2004 - 17:28:38 EDT


Thats what I was hoping for anyway.

TJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Battles" <josh@omg-stfu.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 9:30 AM
Subject: DML: Re: Difference between 91 and 92-up

>
> ""TJ Goettner"" <dakota52318@toad.net> wrote in message
> news:002f01c48e3b$d520ae80$d8b50642@VALUED664B84C7...
> >
> > What trans would the 91 v8s have in them, would it be a 46RH?
> >
> >
> > TJ
>
> I'd think that would be the required transmission.
>
> I don't know the differences between the dodge 2wd and 4wd transmissions,
> but on other manufacturers transmissions, you can usually just swap the
> tailhousing from that of a 4wd to the required length of a 2wd. You may
> want to look into this, perhaps you can continue using your current
> trans....
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> All facts have been omitted from this post.
> www.omg-stfu.com
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 01 2004 - 00:53:42 EDT