In article <cl0oa0$m5r$1@bent.twistedbits.net>, kvmac45@comcast.net writes:
>
>
>
> > Hehehe, you're having all the same thoughts I am! 163k on mine, and just
> > put a new tranny and rear in. Got too much money in her to get rid of her!
> >
> > Have you checked the Mopar PCM for compatability? If I remember right, the
> > one for my year (94) was the same as Mopar recommended for the 360. (I'll
> > have to look that one up again). I'm kind of leaning towards the 360 swap
> > for mine. Since mine is my driver, I'm not looking for anything fancy. The
> > MPI M1 and a little hotter cam oughtta do it for me. :)
> >
> > Brett Forehand
> > '94 Dakota Sport CC 5.2 Auto
> >
> >
>
>
> The Mopar PCM is the same for Ram and Dakota 318s only. The 360 PCM is a
> different part number. FWIW I keep hearing conflicting reports on running a
360
> with a 318 PCM. Some say it works, others say it dosen't. I think the Mopar
PCM
> would have the best chance of running a 360 properly. If I end up going 360 I
> may run it with the Mopar PCM I already have just to see. If it runs fine,
OK.
> If not, I'll buy a PCM.
>
> What area of the country are you in Brett? I ran across a guy with a 92 318
CC
> 2wd auto, complete. Had a minor engine fire, but everything looks fine.
Didn't
> even blister the paint on the hood. Said he got it running once, but it has
> been sitting for a while. Salvage title, located in MA. I gave serious
thought
> to picking it up and shipping it down here to TX. I think I could get it
> running. If not, it would make a good parts truck. Only 20k miles on it. Guy
> wanted $370 for the truck, but shipping would run me about $1000, so no go
for
> me. I may end up trying to buy some parts off it though, like the hood. Plus
I
> have a local ordinance that says non titled/inspected vehicles need to be
> hidden from view.
>
> The mods I have done to mine really woke it up, even for such a high mileage
> truck. Absolutely no problems for daily driving. Makes the commute much more
> fun, but gas mileage gat worse. Primarily due to my right foot. ;)
>
> I am leaning the most toward a 390 simply from a more power aspect.
Ultimately
> though money will probably prevent that, but we shall see. I have some 1.7s
on
> order, so when they show up I'll pull the valve covers off and take a gander
at
> that. Figure I might as well put new valve seals, springs and possibly valves
> in while I am at it. I need to keep downtime to a minimum, so all engine work
> needs to be completed over the weekend. Still, if I can get a good deal on
some
> pistons, rods and crank, then a cheap shortblock is in order, and I'll just
> deal with it.
>
> Maybe one day I'll actually paint the truck. Been peeling for a couple years
> now. ;)
Thanks for the tip, but I'm in Texas as well (again!).
Brett Forehand
'94 Dakota Sport CC 5.2 Auto
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:43 EST