On Wed, April 26, 2006 6:40 pm, jon@dakota-truck.net said:
>
> Instead of taking 80, why not get off the 90 just before Cleveland
> and head southwest on 71 to Columbus?
LOL... I was contemplating this very thing this morning. About 2/3 of the way
through this message http://archives.dakota-truck.net/0604/0414.html you can
see what my thoughts were (text search for "Kansas").
> According to my map, going this route is actually 18 miles shorter
> than taking 80/76 into Denver.
Really? I had figured it was about 45 miles longer. I think my I-80 route
was using the ultra-expensive 470, which might save some distance. Granted,
I've just been using Google Maps and/or Mapquest, which can be pretty
imprecise. I've got TripMaker set up on the laptop at home, I'll have to fire
that up and see what it says.
> I'll save the route on my computer here in case you'd
> like to take a gander at it when you come down.
I'd be interested to check that out, thanks. What software are you using?
-- Jason Bleazard http://drazaelb.blogspot.com Burlington, Ontario his: '95 Dakota Sport 4x4, 3.9 V6, 5spd, Reg. Cab, white hers: '01 Dakota Sport 4x4, 4.7 V8, Auto, Quad Cab, black. . .------------------------------------------------------------------. | Make your plans NOW to attend the National DML Meet in Colorado! | | Date: July 15-23, 2006 - More info: http://meet.dakota-truck.net | `------------------------------------------------------------------'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 01 2006 - 09:38:05 EDT