RE: Re: Re: Tranny fluid capacity - reprise

From: Brian (hskr@cox.net)
Date: Mon Jun 08 2009 - 16:45:58 EDT


I have that pan on my tranny. Just be aware that on the 46RE tranny, it
will require a slight modification to the internal fins on the pan to clear
one of the sensors on the valve body. Nothing a dremel can't knock out in 5
minutes though. And other than the Mopar pan specifically made for the
46RE, I don't know of a true "deep" pan for the 46RE. It already has what
is considered a "deep" pan on it for a 727/518 to clear the valve body that
the older hydraulic trannys don't have. So even with the B&M pan, it
doesn't increase fluid volume any.

brian cropp
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Tom Coulter
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 3:39 PM
To: Dakota Mailing List
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Tranny fluid capacity - reprise

Ahhh-sooooooooooooo ...

Kinda like the (crank case) sump drain pan on some of the old VW Type I's.
I always wanted to get my hands of the "engineers" whose bright minds
decided that the best arrangement for the guy who simply wants to drain a
sump is to require removal of the ENTIRE pan! Thanks for the picture and
the enlightenment. I should be off & running now. I may weld a tap into
the stock pan for a std. plug. Or, I stumbled onto this:

http://cpwstore.carpartswholesale.com/catalog/details/B-and-M/Transmission_P
an/B3210280.html

Pretty trick - probably lots of versions of this out there ...

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.56/2162 - Release Date: 06/08/09
06:01:00



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 14:24:03 EDT