K&N: Waste of money. Was: Re: Wind resistance; was: High RPM's etc.

From: Jon Steiger (steiger@ait.fredonia.edu)
Date: Fri May 09 1997 - 10:09:55 EDT


At 07:28 PM 5/8/97 -0400, Sean Meldrum wrote:
>
>>
>>PS- I asked a mechanic at the local dealer about K&n but he said it was a
>>waste of money because of the temperature the extra air would not help, he
>>says it realy good down south where its hot?
>>
>>
>>Steve Clarke sclarke@cancom.net
>
>Get a new mechanic......if he doesn't know about a product he shouldn't be
>giving his opinion. The open element FIPK clone I plopped on my '97 is
>*THE BEST* $50 performance mod I've ever made....ask around the list a
>bit.....I'm sure others will share their opinions. If you install one you
>won't be sorry.

    I agree. I don't have a K&N to make such a judgement, but it does
sound as if your mechanic needs to go back to school. Now, I could
be wrong, but here's how I see this thing: If anything, a K&N would
be *less* effective in the south (higher temperature) than it would
be in a cooler climate. The hotter the air, the less oxygen molecules
you can cram into your engine. Maybe he meant that those in warmer
climates need the extra help of a K&N whereas those in the north don't?

  From what I've read, a K&N will boost your performance in any
temperature. :)

                                              -Jon-

    Jon Steiger - Network Administrator for Academic Information Technology
    .- steiger@ait.fredonia.edu -- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ -.
    | DoD# 1038, EAA# 518210, NMA# 117376, USUA# A46209, KotWitDoDFAQ |
    | '96 Dodge Dakota SLT V8, '96 Kolb FireFly 447, '91 Yamaha FZR600R |
    `---------------------------------------------------------------------'
     I do not speak for SUNY College at Fredonia; any opinions are my own.

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:40 EDT