Are the HR4's the same as the Radial TA's? I had 295x50x15 TA's on my
5-speed 5.2 Dak, and traction was non-existant.
----------
> From: Alan J. Thompson <vladimir@texas.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: Re: Phat tires
> Date: Sunday, November 29, 1998 10:05 AM
>
> I respectively disagree. The BFG HR4 is a far superior tire for
traction,
> especially compared to the Goodyear GTII. Of course, a good set of
Mickey
> Thompson's or Hoosier's work far better than the BFG's. If cost is a
major
> factor, get the BFG's. If not, opt for the Mickey T's. Just a friendly
> response based on my own experiences.
>
> Vlad
> 96 Indy
> "FASRAM"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Glen
> Renzoni
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 1998 2:06 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: Phat tires
>
>
> Josh, stay away from the BFG Radial TA's. They are a hard compound. They
> last long, but get no traction. IMHO
>
> ----------
> > From: BlKV8Dkota@aol.com
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: Phat tires
> > Date: Saturday, November 28, 1998 11:46 AM
> >
> > I want to get some sticky tires for my truck. I have the stock 15x7
> rims.
> > Could someone tell me the widest size I can stick on the back rims and
> the
> > best brand for the street? Michelin, BF Goodrich, Goodyear or what and
> what
> > the name is like pilot or Radial TA or eagles. I would like the actual
> size
> > and the width in inches.
> >
> > Josh
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:07 EDT