MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)

From: Scott L. (homer@nevada.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 30 1998 - 00:14:50 EST

Next message: William Blount Arthur: "Re: Speed density"
Previous message: jbird@rfc.com: "Dakota Sale"
In reply to: Jack Hilton III: "Mileage improved on the R/T"
Next in thread: Jack Hilton III: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Maybe reply: Jack Hilton III: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Reply: Jon Steiger: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Maybe reply: Jack Hilton III: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Maybe reply: Your Name: "MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Jack Hilton III wrote:

> On the way up, I filled up just before getting on the interstate with
> premium fuel (93 octane).

I don't mean to start a war here, but I think you're crazy for using
anything higher than 87 octane. Just my opinion.

Next message: William Blount Arthur: "Re: Speed density"
Previous message: jbird@rfc.com: "Dakota Sale"
In reply to: Jack Hilton III: "Mileage improved on the R/T"
Next in thread: Jack Hilton III: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Maybe reply: Jack Hilton III: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Reply: Jon Steiger: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Maybe reply: Jack Hilton III: "Re: MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Maybe reply: Your Name: "MPG on the R/T (w/93 octane?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:07 EDT