RE: Rev limiters...

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Sat Feb 20 1999 - 11:42:00 EST


Like we didn't know that. It just seems strange for Dodge to put a limiter
at 5200 and not around 6000 for the V6's.

BTW: BB Chevy's produce their torque at the lower RPM's...and let's not
forget about the difference in mass that is required to move at higher
RPM's.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Mike
> Crumley
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 1:00 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: RE: DML: Rev limiters...
>
>
> At 10:05 PM 2/18/99 , you wrote:
>
> >
> > It's strange though...The Dak's, from what i've heard, are
> "Roller Motors".
> > What's up with the 5200rpm Redline?? My old Camaro with the Roller Cam,
> > Lifters, and Rockers had a redline of 7200rpm (and 408 Cubic
> Inches...not
> > 239). Guess Dodge just doesn't build them like they should.
> (That's why we
> > have the DML.)
>
>
> Congratulations!! You've just discovered the difference between a
> truck engine
> (made to produce low end torque and power for doing things a
> truck does) and a
> hi performance car engine made for a sporty car.
>
> Mike Crumley 97 V6 Auto
> mail to: mcrumley@airmail.net
>
> For others who may not know this:
> When the preacher says, "You may now kiss
> the bride," he's only speaking to the groom.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:41 EDT