Re: RE: Re: RE: 24# Injectors?

From: HEMI@charter.net
Date: Fri Mar 26 1999 - 15:50:50 EST


I thought Sean Meldrum or someone else did that ?

At 01:39 PM 3/26/1999 -0600, you wrote:
>
>I'm really surprised someone hasn't made (or made available) an 02 sensor
>emulator - i.e., an electronic gadget you can wire into your 02 sensor
>harness to send artificial readings to the computer, thus eliminating the
>actual 02 sensor altogether. Seems like this would be an easy thing for an
>electrical engineer to build - anyone remember what the 02 sensor readings
>are under 'normal' conditions? I think it's a rapid fluctuation from -1 to
>+1 or something like that......
>
>'92 Dak CC 2wd 318 3.55
>'84 GoldWing Interstate
>-----Original Message-----
>From: JT McBride <mcbride@abac.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Friday, March 26, 1999 11:21 AM
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: RE: 24# Injectors?
>
>
>>
>>Just thought IŽd point out that there IS a way around this.
>>
>>Disconnect the O2 sensor.
>>
>>At least on the older, pre-OBD3 computers, the mileage hit isnŽt too bad.
>>The engine runs a little on the rich side, per pre-programmed fuel map
>>(rpm, baro pressure, and temp the only inputs).
>>
>>On the post-OBD3 computers, youŽd have to disable both pre- and post-cat O2
>>sensors, or maybe just the pre-cat sensor. Dunno.
>>
>>WhoŽs going to be the first to try this on an OBD3 Dak?
>
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------

Jack Hilton III

Black 1998 Dodge Dakota R/T Club Cab

Charter Pipeline......the Next Wave.....

HEMI@charter.net

http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html

----------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:22 EDT