Re: 4cyl. VS. 8cyl.

From: Mst29@aol.com
Date: Sun May 23 1999 - 15:48:53 EDT

Next message: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: MOPAR Parts Nats( not that long)"
Previous message: Michael Clark: "Re: Stumbling/Backfiring!!"
Maybe in reply to: mrdancer: "4cyl. VS. 8cyl."
Next in thread: Elmer Hanhart: "Re: 4cyl. VS. 8cyl."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I had the same thoughts. The mustang SVO's of the 80's are popular for
road courses. Better weihgt distribution, less cost. and the torque doesn't
overwelm the tires.

Next message: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: MOPAR Parts Nats( not that long)"
Previous message: Michael Clark: "Re: Stumbling/Backfiring!!"
Maybe in reply to: mrdancer: "4cyl. VS. 8cyl."
Next in thread: Elmer Hanhart: "Re: 4cyl. VS. 8cyl."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:08 EDT