Re: Re: Tonneaus - was Gas mileage polls

From: Bob Tom (tigers@bserv.com)
Date: Fri Aug 20 1999 - 16:23:55 EDT

Next message: Bob Tom: "Re: Re: Re: 318 - 360 engine difference"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: clean-aholics"
In reply to: stevie.o@excite.com: "Re: Tonneaus - was Gas mileage polls"
Next in thread: Mag318Racr@aol.com: "Re: Gas Mileage poll. What do you guys get? (15.8 here)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 05:35 AM 8/20/99 PDT, you wrote:
> [SNIP]
>I agree with the aerodynamicas of a brick theory, [SNIP]

I think that the Chrysler site said that the drag coeff.
for the 97 Dak was 0.48 !!! Maybe that's why a tonneau
cover has no/little benefits.

Bob
Burlington, Ontario

'97 CC Sport, 5.2L, 3.55, auto., 4x2, flame red

Next message: Bob Tom: "Re: Re: Re: 318 - 360 engine difference"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: clean-aholics"
In reply to: stevie.o@excite.com: "Re: Tonneaus - was Gas mileage polls"
Next in thread: Mag318Racr@aol.com: "Re: Gas Mileage poll. What do you guys get? (15.8 here)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:57 EDT