Re: Re: Dyno Check RD 52mm TB vs Stock

From: gmvega (gmvega@gateway.net)
Date: Fri Aug 27 1999 - 18:41:21 EDT


I wonder if it needs the 24# injectors to run the TB and Headers? I recall
someone on the list that claimed adignificant improvement with either the
headers or the TB but not both. Too lean?
Gilbert Vega '98 BL CC R/T

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Friday, August 27, 1999 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Dyno Check RD 52mm TB vs Stock

>Just as a test, we took the IAT sensor on a 90% stock 5.2L and just hung it
>out in the open air. Works great!! Try it next time you Dyno the engine
>with the 52M (or any other TB).
>
>- Bernd
>
>
>At 02:43 PM 08/27/1999 +0000, you wrote:
>> >
>> > I did a HP check with JBA headers, JBA down tubes, K & N Gen II, ASP
>> > crank-pulley,
>> > Bullet 3" by 24" muffler and 3" piping cat back to the rear axle. The
TB
>> > is stock
>> > HP 222.3. I lost HP with the RD 52mm TB. That dyno check had 209 HP.
BTW
>> > the 52 mm TB makes a excellent paper weight.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Later
>> >
>> > Martin Tolentino
>>
>>
>>To lean ? This condition was probably what Bruce and Frank were
>>talking about in the Stage II TB project. Now I'm curious about
>>a dyno with this TB and an IAT modification. Thanks Martin.
>>
>>GS -
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:04 EDT