Larger injectors will not help. With the larger bores in the TB, Velocity
slows. What you need to do is re-calibrate the computer (MAP signals) to
compensate for the change. The 52 MM route does flow more air, but how much
do you really need......
Frank
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gmvega [SMTP:gmvega@gateway.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 3:41 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: Dyno Check RD 52mm TB vs Stock
>
> I wonder if it needs the 24# injectors to run the TB and Headers? I
> recall
> someone on the list that claimed adignificant improvement with either the
> headers or the TB but not both. Too lean?
> Gilbert Vega '98 BL CC R/T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Friday, August 27, 1999 3:09 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: Dyno Check RD 52mm TB vs Stock
>
>
> >Just as a test, we took the IAT sensor on a 90% stock 5.2L and just hung
> it
> >out in the open air. Works great!! Try it next time you Dyno the engine
> >with the 52M (or any other TB).
> >
> >- Bernd
> >
> >
> >At 02:43 PM 08/27/1999 +0000, you wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I did a HP check with JBA headers, JBA down tubes, K & N Gen II, ASP
> >> > crank-pulley,
> >> > Bullet 3" by 24" muffler and 3" piping cat back to the rear axle. The
> TB
> >> > is stock
> >> > HP 222.3. I lost HP with the RD 52mm TB. That dyno check had 209 HP.
> BTW
> >> > the 52 mm TB makes a excellent paper weight.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Later
> >> >
> >> > Martin Tolentino
> >>
> >>
> >>To lean ? This condition was probably what Bruce and Frank were
> >>talking about in the Stage II TB project. Now I'm curious about
> >>a dyno with this TB and an IAT modification. Thanks Martin.
> >>
> >>GS -
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:07 EDT