I personally like to read about the R/T information and I don't even own a
gen III dak. Also the name of the list is the "Dakota Mailing List" last
time I checked the R/T still says "Dakota" on it. Maybe those people should
remember this. Oh, BTW, that goes for Durangos as well. They are all based
on the "Dakota"! I personally don't mind the ram owners either. They use
the same engines so they have alot to contribute as well.
Jeff Durling
'96 RC Sport
Bob Tom wrote:
> At 11:22 PM 9/1/99 -0400, you wrote:
> > [snip]
> >I've been on lurker mode for about a month now. I was in digest
> >and didn't keep up very well. I resubscribed for regular posts
> >tonight and I the first thing I see is someone saying no R/T
> >talk here there's a list for them.
> >
> >What are Dakota R/T owners no longer welcome on the DML. I
> >thought this was a list for all Dakotas. If this is the case
> >maybe I should just unsubscribe.
>
> That comment was expressed by some member in one email out of
> how many emails. There are many R/T owners on the DML. That's
> why I personally posted the latest Canadian news about the R/T
> towing issue or any R/T information that I may come across.
> If I was allowed to join the R/T list, I'd post them there as well.
>
> >From time to time, I fun with the R/T owners but that's no different
> than the good-natured jabs in the manual vs auto, V6s vs V8s, etc.
> comments that flare up periodically on the list.
>
> In the past, you've contributed with Dakota/mopar news out of the Mich.
> area and with performance mods that you've done on your R/T. I
> personally hope that you decide to continue to do so in the future.
>
> Bob
> Burlington, Ontario
>
> '97 CC Sport, 5.2L, 3.55, auto., 4x2, flame red
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:30 EDT