Re: Alpine Vs Kenwood cd player comparision (non dak)

From: Erika Ipes (msbavior@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2000 - 20:30:43 EST


Funny you bring this up. I have an Alpine in my truck... and it keeps
spitting CD at me instead of playing them. Also I can take a badly scratched
CD and IF I can get the thing to except the CD it hardly plays it, yet my
b-friend has a stock tape/CD player in his Dodge Ram that will play another,
even copied MP3's that might CD player refused to play. I was thinking of
switching to a Kenwood. Now I'm just confused :) I'm in Audio hell!

Erika

>From: Dester223@aol.com
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Alpine Vs Kenwood cd player comparision (non dak)
>Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 18:45:27 EST
>
>After the discussion of the Alpine and Kenwood headunits on the list. I
>would like to conclude that the alpine is a much better unit in it's lazer
>pickup. There is a pretty badly scratched up CD (hm.. I can't think of
>anyone who has a CD player without one)
>
>Anyways. in my 3disk alpine indash changer. it plays the CD and skips a
>little bit. Tested the same disk in my sister's Kenwood 3009, then my
>friend's 8009 (which I sold him) and both their CD players skipped to hell.
>you wouldn't even want to hear it. So. I'd like to just inform people that
>there is a difference in CD players, and that some have a better lazer pick
>up than others.
>
>Funny thing is. I took the same CD inside and put it in my CD-Rom and it
>skips a lot too... not as bad as the kenwood, but a lot more than the
>alpine, and there are spots where it keeps on repeating the same skip and
>can't play it...
>just some food for thought.
>-Dester
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:48:06 EDT