well out of the 5 times we've compared them, we've pretty much covered the
gamut on ways to connect/disconnect the thing. On that particular run, the
customer came in with the JET already connected for several days, then we
simply unhooked it. I can tell you from other runs we've done that the
whole "let the computer learn the JET chip" notion is bunk, the evidence
just doesn't support them.
These graphs also support claims from probably 90% of the people I've talked
with that own the chips, they experience a power gain only at part throttle
driving. That is further evidenced at the R/T meet in Jacksonville a couple
weekends ago when Terry H passed around his JET II, not 1 single gain was
reported with it.
_______________________
Jon Smith--Raleigh, NC
jon@fast4x4.net
www.fast4x4.net
'95 Dakota 4x4 318 CC auto
How long did you allow the PCM to relearn the sensors after plugging in the
JetII??
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Smith" <jon@fast4x4.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 7:22 PM
Subject: DML: JET chip dyno info
> Just added a comparison of the JET chip. (stage II) to the webpage.
> Interesting to see where the claimed +20ish hp comes in.... all 300rpm
> worth!
>
> Get real, get MoPar
> _______________________
> Jon Smith--Raleigh, NC
> jon@fast4x4.net
> www.fast4x4.net
> '95 Dakota 4x4 318 CC auto
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:30 EDT