Totally LMAO Scott. Hahaha.
-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
We'sa gonna smash some Lightnins!
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Quaranta <mquarantaca@earthlink.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Dodge versus the Lightning
> on 12/14/00 10:13 PM, Jimmy L at blackishdak@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > Do you not read?? Look at the bottom of this email and read it 10 times
> > over. And I quote "I went and priced a lightning for $hit$ and giggles,
it
> > was 27,900 out the door for a brand spankin new 2000 white lightning"
> >
> > Soooooo, that would be a Brand New 2000 lightning, eh? 2000, brand
spankin
> > new with 11 miles on the odo, does that qualify as new? I think so. If I
am
> > not mistaken, Ted got his Lightning for a similar dollar amount, maybe
less.
> >
> > Anyhoo, I do not keep up with the R/T boys but there should be a lot
more
> > than 4 or 5 of them running 13's NA for the starting point that they
have.
> >
> > And you are right, we will not discuss the 4.7, Ryan (that a sibling or
good
> > friend?) has already been put in his place on the 4.7 and came back with
an
> > absolute childish remark, I hope you don't do the same. Definitely good
luck
> > to ya on the lightning shootout, I would also love to see you guys kick
some
> > ass.
> >
> > Jimmy Latano
> > '99 5.2 RC 5spd 14.10@99.07
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > OK price it at Edmunds. MSRP fora 01 lightning is 33k. Was that
Lighting
> > brand new? Come on, I dout it was new, if so,it'ste cheapest new
Lightning
> > ever for someone who desn't have the A-Plan By the end of winter I'll
be
> > eating those things N/A with slightly over 20k invested, including the
> > truck. The 360 is probably the most-underestimated engine ever. it
will
> > take a lot more than people think. Geez, there are what, 4-5 NA R/ts
that
> > have run high/mid 13s N/A! Most with 2k or LESS in mods! That IMHO is
mre
> > impressive than a supercharged/intercooled truck with 295/55/18 meats
> > running low 14s/high 13s! LOL. It's nice to see so many people
brain-washed
> > about the Lightning :/ Oh, I also priced a 00 model at the SVT
dealership
> > in Lexington, lowest they would go is 31k (32500 sticker). Priced new
to
> > new, a fully loaded RC R/T will be generally 10k cheaper than a
Lightning.
> > That's no bull. Hell, we won't even talk about the 4.7 that can be had
in a
> > dak for what, 15k and run mid 14s bone stock?
> >
> > Brian
> > "It's only crap if it is not the truth, therefore I do NOT talk crap"
> >
> >> Man, whoever posted previously that you talk a lot of crap is
absolutely
> >> right. I went and priced a lightning for $hit$ and giggles, it was
27,900
> >> out the door for a brand spankin new 2000 white lightning. You really
> >> oughtta get your facts straight, you are gonna get your ass handed to
you
> > by
> >> those Lightning's. Seeing as you are "gonna" spank them silly as you
say,
> >> email me when you are ready for them. And along with the other emails,
you
> >> never posted your 1/4 times, got something to hide? Good Luck
> >>
> >> Jimmy Latano
> >> '99 5.2 RC 5spd 14.10@99.07
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
> Dude ,
>
>
> Thats a shame that there is even a 00 Lightening left on the lot it almost
> 2001 and that was a limited production truck.....
>
>
> maybe thats why its 27900, most of the dealers here in so cal get "list"
and
> the lightenings are all sold to overweight people in a mid 50 crisis .
>
> Hey maybe you can get them to put Firestones on and give you 1.9%
> interest.....I think that ferd has you name written all over it...Great
> White Hope.....
>
>
> On the other hand I get a ton of looks from the under 25 crowd.
>
>
> Scott Q
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:59 EDT