Re: 318 (5.2L) Stroker

From: Mark Kuzia (flyboy01@mediaone.net)
Date: Sat May 12 2001 - 14:20:06 EDT


You could build one, but why? Its the same stroke, just less bore. For the
money it takes, you could drop in a healthily modded 360 that will make way
more power.

Mark Kuzia
flyboy01@mediaone.net
http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph
~360ci, 5-spd, 4.11 LS (8 3/4 [3.90 SG] coming soon)
1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)

----- Original Message -----
From: <KenneallyIII@Gateway.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:30 PM
Subject: DML: 318 (5.2L) Stroker

>
> I've been checking out the Hughes engine site.
> Has anyone out there tried building a stroked Magnum 318 using the 340 4"
stroker crank?
> Custom pistons would definately be necessary; but can the crank be fitted
into the block?
> How about the rear main seal situation?
> I've got a second 318 Mag. to play with, and 390 ci or so sounds pretty
good.
> Also, has anyone retrofitted a KenneBell S/C into a Pre-'94 Dakota?
> The folks at KB have been less than helpful when I've brought up the
subject of my '93.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> (__) ,---------. NOTE: The preceding message was sent via Jaek
and
> (oo) | :\/: _ _ \ Jon's WWW mail cow gateway. That is to say,
the
> /-------\/_/ : :: :: : ) person who sent this message could in fact be
an
> / | MAIL|| \_ ' '`-'`-'/ anonymous prankster. Even though this message
was
> * ||"" || \__________/ mailed to you from the cs.fredonia.edu domain,
it
> ^^ ^^ could have been generated by anyone in the
world.
> Please keep this in mind. Thank you! --Jaek (smit2204) and -Jon-
(stei0302)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:28 EDT