Re: how bad are the stock rockers?

From: Gmblows@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 22:13:19 EST


Just a quick observation.

If two cams with similar lift have different durations,
the cam with less duration, *usually*, will have a more aggressive
lift rate, which will put more stress on the valvetrain.

I'm with you with regards to RPM.

> I did some research and found out the the 380hp/360
> Mopar crate engine uses the same stock rockers and pushrods that our
engines
> leave the factory with, and it has a more radical cam (288/292 duration,
> .501/.513 lift) than my Comp Cams cam (260/264 duration, .512/.512 lift),
> therefore a higher powerband. The valvesprings they use are about the same
> specs also (mine have 120lbs seat pressure, 310 open... theirs have 140lbs
> seat pressure, and 290 open). Why wouldn't the stock rockers be good enough
> for my engine if they're good enough for the crate engine?
>
> --
> Doug Myers
> -------------
> '99 Dakota RC/SB 5.9L/5-speed/3.92SG - 14.320@98.46mph
> R/T wheels, Nitto NT-450 275/50R17 tires, K&N Gen II FIPK, Comp Cams '604
> cam, ProGear timing chain, MP 2-bbl MPI, MP 1.92" R/T heads, Hughes' roller
> rockers, MP polished valve covers, ASP crank pulley, MP Headers, 3" Dynomax
> cat, 3" Flowmaster, Accel Supercoil, Magnecor KV-85 8.5mm Race Wires,
> Melling HV oil pump, Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:40 EDT