!!! I use the truck for work(40-60k per year). I cannot 'afford' even one
day in the garage during the busy season.so I figure(maybe wrongfully??)
that a newer truck will be less likly to break down. I am not commited to
the new truck...the dealer ordered it without me making a deposit....so I
still have time to decide.
""Will Coughlin"" <willcoughlin2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:F399pBtEYBLmly2d1QJ00012c7d@hotmail.com...
> Hey, just curious- why in the heck would you trade a 5.2L '99 for a 4.7L
> '02?? If I had the choice, it'd be no question- I'd pick a '99 5.2L
anyday!
> Got any specific reasons?
>
> Will Coughlin willcoughlin@hotmail.com
> '00 Reg. cab 2wd, 4.7L/NV3500HD/9.25" 3.92 sure-grip
>
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Gary Bower" <gwbower@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: DML: High-mileage dakotas??
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:55:34 -0500
>
> 121,000 on a 99 5.2L CC 4x4. soon to be replaced (if all goes well) with a
> '02 CC 4x4 4.7L
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:40 EDT