Go to the Mopar Chat, look under the technical forum for Ram and they have
already prove that the HT III works not the Stage II.
----------------------------------------------------------
Steven
2003 Dodge Quad Ram Hemi 5.7 (FOR SALE-wife)
2000 Dodge Dakota S/Hemi (Some idiot hit the vehicle)
2000 Roush Ford Mustang (1 of 2 beta vehicles)
1999 Chevy Astro (A.K.A. GM Junk)
1993 Geo Tracker (Amazing vehicle that keeps running)
PROJECT CAR:
1992 Suzuki Swift GT 1775lb) Intercooled Turbo - 350HP
---------------------------------------------------------
FUTURE PURCHASES:
04 Dodge Ram SRT-10 or 05 Dodge Dakota SRT-8(replace the Dakota)
04 Dodge Hemi Durango (replace Hemi- wife)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of TX QC2000
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:24 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Hypertech Programmer III or Jet Stage II -- which is better?
I'm curious whether anyone knows or cares to hazard an
educated guess as to which product: Hypertech's
Programmer III or Jet's Stage II chip for the 5.9L
engine, would yield better performance (read: more HP
and Torque). Any insightful advice would be greatly appreciated.
=====
'00 Quadcab SLT+ Garnet Red 4x4 (AWD) 5.9L 46RE 3.55 LSD. For list of
modifications to my QC, see my profile:
http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Vof5jrNb0pR1M/
For pictures of my QC & Accessories: http://www.geocities.com/txqc2000
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:43 EST